From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Women's Health>
  4. Clinical Practice Guideline Watch

Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Women with Hormone Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer: Update from the American Society of Clinical Oncology

New guidelines emphasize use of aromatase inhibitors, whether alone or sequentially with tamoxifen.

Based on findings published since 2004, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has updated its previous guidelines (JW Womens Health Apr 6 2005), focusing on optimal adjuvant endocrine strategies involving tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors (AIs), or both in sequence. Highlights of the new guidelines are as follows:

  • To lengthen disease-free survival and lower risk for recurrence (i.e., locoregional or distant recurrence or contralateral breast cancer), postmenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer should consider an AI, either as primary adjuvant therapy for ≤5 years or sequentially after 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen to yield a total of 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy. Women who discontinue initial AI therapy before 5 years should consider using tamoxifen to bring the total duration of adjuvant therapy to 5 years.
  • Women who have completed 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy can benefit from switching to an AI. This extended therapy should not exceed 5 additional years.
  • ASCO does not recommend using specific markers to choose optimal adjuvant therapy.
  • Because of drug interactions, caution is recommended when tamoxifen and CYP2D6 inhibitors (e.g., paroxetine, fluoxetine, bupropion) are used concomitantly.
  • When advising women about adjuvant therapy, clinicians should consider the adverse effect profiles of tamoxifen (venous thromboembolism and endometrial cancer, polyps, and hyperplasia) and AIs (osteoporosis, fractures, and arthralgias). Switching from tamoxifen to an AI (or vice versa) might be appropriate if adverse effects become intolerable or precipitate nonadherence.
  • Clinically important differences have not been shown among currently marketed AIs. Postmenopausal patients who cannot tolerate a particular AI should consider switching to a different AI or to tamoxifen.
  • Women who are premenopausal or perimenopausal at diagnosis should be treated with 5 years of tamoxifen.

Comment: These guidelines advocate the incorporation of AIs (whether sequentially with tamoxifen or alone) into adjuvant endocrine therapy for postmenopausal women who have hormone receptor–positive breast cancer. Women's health clinicians should monitor bone-mineral density at baseline and during therapy with AIs and should recognize that bisphosphonates can mitigate skeletal health concerns associated with AIs. Clinicians also should recognize that, although tamoxifen's risk-benefit profile is better in women who have undergone hysterectomies, absolute risks associated with tamoxifen are higher in obese women because of their elevated baseline risk for thromboembolism. Depression is common in breast cancer survivors. When helping tamoxifen users choose antidepressant therapy, clinicians should keep in mind that venlafaxine — a weak inhibitor of CYP2D6 — might be a more appropriate choice than paroxetine or fluoxetine, which potently inhibit CYP2D6 (JW Womens Health Mar 4 2010 and JW Womens Health May 13 2010). As longer-term follow-up data on adjuvant therapy for breast cancer are published, evolving ASCO guidelines will continue to optimize decisions that benefit women with this common malignancy.

Andrew M. Kaunitz, MD

Published in Journal Watch Women's Health July 29, 2010

Citation(s):

Burstein HJ et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline: Update on adjuvant endocrine therapy for women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010 Jul 12; [e-pub ahead of print]. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.26.3756)

Reader Remarks:

Review and add to remarks on this article

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. We ask that you keep your remarks to a reasonable length, and we reserve the right to withhold publication of remarks that do not meet this standard.

The editors of Journal Watch may respond to Reader Remarks, but we cannot promise to respond to a particular remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Sign-In

Forgot your password? Login via Athens
or your institution

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2010. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.