From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Women's Health>
  4. Summary and Comment

Live-Birth Rate as a Measure of IVF Success

Cumulative live-birth rate could be a practical means of evaluating potential for a live birth across multiple cycles.

In vitro fertilization (IVF) databases often cite pregnancies per cycle as an indicator of clinical success. However, this marker might not help patients evaluate the potential for a live birth across multiple cycles. In a retrospective cohort study that involved 6164 patients who underwent their first fresh-embryo IVF cycles at a single practice (>14,000 IVF cycles), investigators evaluated an alternative assessment that could provide IVF patients with a more useful measure of their chances for pregnancy. The primary outcome was the delivery of ≥1 live infants in ≤6 cycles. An "optimistic" live-birth rate was calculated based on the assumption that patients who did not return for subsequent IVF cycles had the same probability of pregnancies that resulted in live births as did patients who continued treatment; a "conservative" live-birth rate was calculated based on the assumption that patients who did not return for treatment had no live births.

The overall cumulative live-birth rate after 6 cycles was estimated to be 72% with the optimistic method and 51% with the conservative method. Stratification of results by age showed that, among patients who were <35 at the time of their first cycles, the optimistic and conservative live-birth rates were 86% and 65%, respectively. Women who were ≥40 had optimistic and conservative live-birth rates of only 42% and 23%.

Comment: The authors note that the true live-birth rate probably fell between the optimistic and conservative estimates. Nonetheless, this outcome measure allows patients to assess their chances for live births across multiple IVF cycles. The large sample size supports previous findings of diminishing fertility with a woman’s advancing age despite assisted reproductive treatment. However, because the data are practice-specific and the study excluded common interventions (such as donor oocytes or surrogacy), the results might have limited applicability. Nevertheless, the investigators’ proposition that cumulative live-birth rates offer a more practical estimate of IVF patients’ chances of live births deserves attention.

Sandra Ann Carson, MD

Published in Journal Watch Women's Health January 14, 2009

Citation(s):

Malizia BA et al. Cumulative live-birth rates after in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med 2009 Jan 15; 360:236.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Other Perspectives

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2009. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.