From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Women's Health>
  4. Summary and Comment

Is Liquid-Based Cytology Better Than Conventional Cytology for Cervical Cancer Screening?

Liquid-based cytology detected CIN grade 1, but not CIN grade 2 or higher, more often than conventional cytology.

Liquid-based cytology is widely used for cervical cancer screening, but no large, randomized studies have assessed its accuracy. Italian investigators randomized more than 45,000 women (age range, 25–60) to undergo cervical cancer screening with either conventional or liquid-based cytology. The endpoint was long-term rates of histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or higher.

Compared with conventional cytology, liquid-based cytology had a higher sensitivity for detecting CIN grade 1, but not CIN grade 2 or higher, when both atypical cells of undetermined significance and low-grade intraepithelial lesions were used as cutoff points for colposcopy. In fact, liquid-based cytology had a significantly lower positive predictive value for all CIN endpoints. However, liquid-based cytology did significantly reduce the number of results considered unsatisfactory because of obscuring inflammation.

Comment: This study raises a good question. Are we doing Pap smears to detect any abnormal finding, or only high-risk findings? Although liquid-based cytology predicted more mild abnormalities, its sensitivity for detecting high-grade CIN was similar to that of conventional cytology. These findings suggest that the advantage of liquid-based cytology is its lower rate of unsatisfactory slides. What’s more, liquid-based cytology allows reflex testing for human papillomavirus, providing important additional information.

Wendy S. Biggs, MD

Published in Journal Watch Women's Health July 26, 2007

Citation(s):

Ronco G et al. Accuracy of liquid based versus conventional cytology: Overall results of new technologies for cervical cancer screening: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2007 Jul 7; 335:28.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Related Content

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2007. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.