From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Women's Health>
  4. Summary and Comment

Ovarian Cancer Treatment: Predictors of Comprehensive Surgery

Patient, surgeon, and hospital characteristics were associated with receiving comprehensive surgery.

Ovarian cancer is rare, but it is more deadly than other gynecologic malignancies because most ovarian tumors are already advanced at diagnosis. Optimal initial surgical treatment is a key factor in improving ovarian cancer outcomes. In this federally funded U.S. cohort study, investigators evaluated the surgical treatment of more than 10,000 women (mean age, 60; 84% white) who received primary surgical treatment for ovarian cancer from 1999 to 2002 in one of nine states.

Forty-two percent of the patients underwent surgery in teaching hospitals. One third of the patients had surgery in low-volume hospitals (<10 ovarian cancer surgeries annually). Nearly half the patients (48%) were operated on by surgeons who performed fewer than 10 ovarian cancer surgeries each year, with 25% of patients undergoing surgery by very-low-volume surgeons (≤1 ovarian cancer surgery annually). In South Carolina (the only state in which surgeon subspecialist status was available), gynecologic oncologists (GOs) performed 70% of ovarian cancer operations. Patients with primary ovarian cancer who underwent both a lymph node dissection and omentectomy/cytoreduction were considered to have received comprehensive surgery.

Overall, 67% of patients received comprehensive surgery. Factors significantly associated with being less likely to receive comprehensive surgery included age 71 and older, black or Hispanic race, Medicaid funding, surgery performed by a very-low-volume surgeon, and surgery not performed by a GO. Among nonteaching hospitals, operations performed at low-volume facilities were less likely to be comprehensive. Among teaching hospitals, surgery volume was not associated with likelihood of receiving comprehensive surgery.

Comment: That so many U.S. women with ovarian cancer do not receive appropriate primary surgery may come as a surprise. These data underscore the importance of referring women with suspected ovarian cancer to GOs who operate at hospitals prepared to meet the surgical needs of women with this lethal malignancy.

— Andrew M. Kaunitz MD

Published in Journal Watch Women's Health May 3, 2007

Citation(s):

Goff BA et al. Predictors of comprehensive surgical treatment in patients with ovarian cancer. Cancer 2007 Apr 9; 109:2031-42; [e-pub ahead of print]. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22604)

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Related Content

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2007. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.