From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Women's Health>
  4. Summary and Comment

Uterine Artery Embolization vs. Surgery for Women with Symptomatic Fibroids

UAE offers quicker recovery but may necessitate additional procedures.

Despite the extensive data on uterine artery embolization (UAE) procedures (Journal Watch Women’s Health Aug 23 2005), randomized trials comparing UAE and hysterectomy have been limited by small numbers and brief follow-ups. In this U.K. trial, patients (mean age, 43 years) with symptomatic uterine fibroids were randomized either to UAE (95 evaluable patients) or to abdominal hysterectomy or myomectomy, depending on whether they wanted to retain their uteri (45 evaluable patients).

At 1 month and 12 months after the procedure, survey scores for quality of life, symptoms, and resumption of usual activities were similar in the two groups. Median hospital stay was significantly shorter in the UAE group than in the surgery group. Likewise, return to work and to other activities was significantly earlier after UAE. Although the incidence of major adverse events was similar in both treatment arms, 8 of 10 events in the surgery group occurred during initial hospitalization, whereas 15 of 16 events in the UAE group occurred after discharge. Twenty percent of women in the UAE group required an additional invasive procedure for continued or recurrent symptoms.

Comment: Uterine fibroids are the most common indication for hysterectomy in U.S. women; thus, less-invasive treatments are welcome. Because uncertainties remain as to whether UAE is appropriate for women who might want to conceive, it is surprising that this trial included women who wished to retain their fertility. In addition, if some hysterectomies had been performed as laparoscopically assisted vaginal procedures, return to work probably would have been sooner. We await longer-term results from this ongoing study; nonetheless, we now have sufficient experience with UAE to discuss it routinely with women who have symptomatic fibroids and who are facing surgery. These results will help us counsel our patients about the pros and cons of hysterectomy (definitive treatment, slower recovery) and UAE (quicker recovery, risk for additional treatment).

— Andrew M. Kaunitz MD

Published in Journal Watch Women's Health March 15, 2007

Citation(s):

The REST Investigators. Uterine-artery embolization versus surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids. N Engl J Med 2007 Jan 25; 356:360-70.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Other Perspectives

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2007. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.