From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Women's Health>
  4. Summary and Comment

Stirrups: Because We Have Always Done It That Way?

Women reacted favorably to pelvic examinations without stirrups.

Many women feel both physical and psychological discomfort during pelvic examinations. This trial evaluated women’s experience during routine pelvic exams and cytology screening with or without the use of stirrups. The pelvic examination without stirrups was performed by placing the woman’s feet at the corners of the examining table. A total of 197 women were randomized to either type of examination and used visual analog scales to rate physical discomfort, sense of vulnerability and defenseless, and sense of control.

Women in the "non" stirrup group felt significantly less discomfort than those in the stirrup group. Moreover, women undergoing examination without stirrups felt a significant reduction in the sense of vulnerability. The authors note that once the woman’s feet are placed in stirrups, getting out can be awkward and changing hip or leg positioning due to discomfort is difficult. The quality of the Pap smears did not differ between the two groups.

Comment: Why do we use stirrups? Perhaps because we have always done it that way. Sometimes a pelvic examination is deferred in inpatient or outpatient settings because stirrups are unavailable or the patient cannot be moved from a hospital bed or gurney. This study demonstrates that at least cervical cytology can be successfully performed without stirrups. However, the study did not evaluate other important aspects of the pelvic examination: visibility of the external genitalia and vagina and quality of the bimanual examination.

— Ann J. Davis, MD

Published in Journal Watch Women's Health September 21, 2006

Citation(s):

Seehusen DA et al. Improving women’s experience during speculum examinations at routine gynaecological visits: Randomised clinical trial. BMJ 2006 Jul 22; 333:171-3.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Other Perspectives

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2006. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.