From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Women's Health>
  4. Summary and Comment

Does Knowing Fetal Oxygen Saturation Matter?

Use of fetal pulse oximetry made no difference in cesarean delivery rate.

Despite the wide use of intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring, its benefits have been debated, particularly in the context of cesarean delivery rates. In 2000, the FDA conditionally approved a fetal oximetry device that was developed to help characterize fetal condition in the presence of a nonreassuring heart rate. Investigators evaluated whether clinical knowledge of fetal oxygen saturation as an adjunct to conventional monitoring was associated with a reduction in the cesarean delivery rate.

They randomized more than 5000 healthy full-term nulliparous women in labor either to a "masked group" in which the fetal oxygen sensor was inserted but the oxygen saturation values were hidden from the clinicians, or to an "open group" in which the values were displayed and available to the clinicians. All women also underwent conventional electronic fetal monitoring. Rates and indications for cesarean deliveries, fetal heart tracings, and various markers of compromised neonatal condition such as Apgar <4, need for intubation, or admission to intensive care were compared.

The cesarean delivery rate did not differ significantly between the open group and the masked group (26.3% and 27.5%, respectively). In addition, the condition of the infants did not differ between the two groups. Contrary to the results of a smaller prior study, no intergroup differences in cesarean delivery rate were observed for the indication of a nonreassuring fetal heart rate or for dystocia.

Comment: Reducing the U.S. cesarean delivery rate, which is almost 30%, is certainly a laudable goal. Despite the conditional approval of a fetal pulse oximeter, acceptance of oximetry into clinical practice has awaited further clinical studies. This stands in contrast to the almost universal adaptation of conventional electronic fetal monitoring. The results of this trial do not support the idea that fetal pulse oximetry, an expensive technique, will reduce the current cesarean rate or improve neonatal outcomes.

— Ann J. Davis, MD

Published in Journal Watch Women's Health December 7, 2006

Citation(s):

Bloom SL et al. Fetal pulse oximetry and cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2006 Nov 23; 355:2195-202.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2006. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.