From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Women's Health>
  4. Summary and Comment

Ovulation Eggs Women On

Even though these women were not trying to conceive, they had intercourse most frequently on their "fertile days."

The frequency of intercourse is believed to increase around the time of ovulation. To determine whether such an increase in sexual activity naturally occurs, researchers examined data on 70 women not trying to conceive -- 39 who were using nonhormonal intrauterine devices and 31 who previously had undergone tubal sterilization. All were in stable sexual relationships; none had chronic illness; and most were white, college-educated, and in their late twenties or early thirties.

The women collected daily first-void urine specimens, from which estrogen and progesterone metabolites were assayed to determine the date of ovulation. They also kept daily intercourse diaries.

The researchers found that intercourse occurred significantly more frequently during the 6 days ending in ovulation, designated as the "fertile days": Mean daily frequency was 24% higher during this period than during all other nonbleeding days in the cycle.

Comment: This study provides robust data suggesting that intercourse naturally occurs more frequently during the days when conception is most likely. The 24% increase in sexual activity could be useful knowledge in counseling certain couples trying to conceive. As an aside, about 40% more women who ovulated on Saturday or Sunday had intercourse during ovulation, compared with those who ovulated on other days of the week. Women trying to conceive who ovulate on non-weekend days can be encouraged to make a special effort to have sex on those days.

— Sandra Ann Carson, MD

Published in Journal Watch Women's Health September 21, 2004

Citation(s):

Wilcox AJ et al. On the frequency of intercourse around ovulation: Evidence for biological influences. Hum Reprod 2004 Jul; 19:1539-43.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2004. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.