From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Women's Health>
  4. Summary and Comment

Epidural vs. Combined Spinal-Epidural Analgesia

Epidural analgesia is commonly used during childbirth, but there is concern about whether it leads to more C-sections among nulliparous women. This study randomized 761 nulliparous women to either continuous epidural analgesia or a combination of spinal and epidural analgesia that maintains motor function and allows ambulation. All patients were in spontaneous labor and had requested epidurals.

There were no significant differences between the analgesia groups in the C-section rate, incidence of dystocia, maternal or fetal complications, or patient satisfaction. More women using the combination analgesia developed pruritus and requested additional anesthetic. Risk factors associated with dystocia and C-section included epidural administered at less than 4 cm of dilation (odds ratio 2.2; p<0.001) or with the fetal vertex at a negative station (OR, 2.5; p<0.001), and inability to walk. Women in the epidural-only group had more instrumental deliveries.

Comment: This study did not show significantly better outcomes using spinal-epidural analgesia as compared with continuous epidural in nulliparous women, but the spinal-epidural combination is safe and allows women to walk. As pointed out in an editorial, the authors could not assess whether the epidurals themselves led to C-section, or whether women in early labor who ask for epidurals are more likely to have dysfunctional labor that would lead to a C-section.

— W Levinson

Published in Journal Watch Women's Health January 1, 1998

Citation(s):

Nageotte MP et al. Epidural analgesia compared with combined spinal-epidural analgesia during labor in nulliparous women. N Engl J Med 1997 Dec 11 337 1715-1719.

Birnbach DJ. Analgesia for labor. N Engl J Med 1997 Dec 11 337 1764-1766.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 1998. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.